Parrish v. United States
View Official PDFBelow are plain-language sections to help you understand what the Court decided in Parrish v. United States and why it matters. Quotes are taken from the syllabus (the Court’s short summary at the start of the opinion).
Summary
A short, plain-English overview of Parrish v. United States.
In Parrish v. United States, federal inmate Donte Parrish challenged the dismissal of his lawsuit seeking damages for time spent in segregated confinement. The Fourth Circuit dismissed his appeal due to a late notice of appeal, but the Supreme Court reversed this decision. The Court found that a notice of appeal filed before the reopening of the appeal period should relate forward to the date of reopening, allowing Parrish's appeal to proceed.
Holding
The single most important “bottom line” of what the Court decided in Parrish v. United States.
The Court held that a litigant who files a notice of appeal before the reopening of the appeal period does not need to file a second notice after reopening, as the original notice relates forward to the reopening date.
Constitutional Concepts
These are the Constitution-related themes that appear in Parrish v. United States. Click a concept to see other cases that involve the same idea.
-
Why Due Process is relevant to Parrish v. United States
The case involves procedural issues related to the timing and filing of appeals, which are part of the due process rights ensuring fair legal procedures.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)A litigant who files a notice of appeal after the original appeal deadline but before the court grants reopening need not file a second notice after reopening.
Key Quotes
Short excerpts from the syllabus in Parrish v. United States that support the summary and concepts above.
A litigant who files a notice of appeal after the original appeal deadline but before the court grants reopening need not file a second notice after reopening.
The original notice relates forward to the date reopening is granted.
Applying the relation-forward rule, Parrish's notice related forward to the date of the District Court's reopening order.